Type your search query and hit enter:
All Rights ReservedView Non-AMP Version
Type your search query and hit enter:
Categories: 注目ニュース
アランカール、まさかの「春天」級大敗！ファン激怒の超絶クソ騎乗を徹底分析
Arancar’s Controversial Positioning Ignites Fierce 5ch Debate!
The race on December 14, 2025, saw overwhelming criticism on 5ch horse racing forums regarding the ride of Arancar, the 1st favorite, specifically focusing on its positioning during the race. Users voiced strong disapproval, using terms like “underperformed” and “fatal,” sparking widespread questions about the jockey’s judgment and intentions. The debate also extended to doubts about the horse’s true ability. This article delves into the intense discussions, analyzing in detail what precisely fueled such significant user dissatisfaction.
目次
- Table of Contents
- Arancar’s Race: What Went Wrong?
- Jockey Under Fire: Scrutiny and Specific Criticisms
- Arancar’s True Ability: A Subject of Intense Discussion
- The Road Ahead: Arancar’s Future and Jockey Speculation
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- References
Table of Contents
- Arancar’s Race: What Went Wrong?
- Jockey Under Fire: Scrutiny and Specific Criticisms
- Arancar’s True Ability: A Subject of Intense Discussion
- The Road Ahead: Arancar’s Future and Jockey Speculation
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- References
Arancar’s Race: What Went Wrong?
The primary targets of criticism regarding Arancar’s race were its extremely conservative early positioning and the subsequent premature surge. After the start, the horse dropped significantly to the very rear of the field, drawing comments such as:
“Dropped back only to aim for a minor placing, huh?”
“Too averse to running in the pack.”
“Absolutely didn’t want to get caught in the crowd!”
“Safety first, safety first, safety first… and this is the result.”
This isolated “Potsun” (meaning isolated at the back) positioning, attributed to an excessive avoidance of the horse crowd, raised significant questions among users. Furthermore, the overly early move from the 3rd corner also drew sharp criticism:
“He’s not riding Deep Impact, you know.”
“Moved up at the 3rd corner and already had nothing left? Laughable.”
“Early move, LOL.”
“To win from that position, you’d need a Harp Star-level horse.”
“That kind of race strategy only works for historically great horses.”
Many comments questioned the jockey’s decision-making, which seemed to treat Arancar as if it were a legendary racehorse. Ultimately, the horse expended its energy prematurely and failed to contend for the top spots, pushing user dissatisfaction to its peak.
Jockey Under Fire: Scrutiny and Specific Criticisms
Criticism for this ride heavily centered on a specific jockey, with frequent use of the derogatory nickname “Tsukue” (机, meaning “desk”) and comparisons to past races.
“A truly terrible ride, comparable to Samekatsu’s Spring Tenma.”
“See? It’s Tsukue. This guy is just incompetent.”
“Why did he drop back so much? Why is he so bad?”
“Ankatsu is even criticizing Kitamura Yuichi!”
“Following Croix and Bellerose, this is his third consecutive terrible ride. Northern Farm must be furious, he might get sidelined.”
“Nominated for worst ride of the year. Only Buena Vista could have won with that kind of race.”
“He was thoroughly criticized on BS horse racing.”
“A ride that insulted horse racing fans.”
These comments reveal anger not just over the immediate race result but also accumulated dissatisfaction with previous rides and repeated disappointments from popular horses. Some even included extreme remarks like “investigate for match-fixing” and “monitor his bank accounts,” underscoring the intense emotional backlash from users.
Arancar’s True Ability: A Subject of Intense Discussion
While the primary focus of criticism was on the jockey, diverse opinions emerged regarding Arancar’s inherent ability. Many suggested that its true potential was obscured by the ill-judged ride.
“It showed good footwork, so it’s not weak. I wanted a third place finish.”
“It stretched its legs at the end, this horse is quite strong. Probably the strongest in this field.”
“I think it’s strong; if it were weak, it wouldn’t have extended like that. It showed good speed for a long time.”
“It wasn’t using its legs when the pace slackened; it was surging at a fast point. With a ride like this, it’s hard to tell if it’s truly strong.”
These comments indicate that many users believe the horse possesses high ability, despite being subjected to a demanding and exhausting race. However, as the comment “With a ride like this, it’s hard to tell if it’s truly strong” suggests, there’s significant frustration that Arancar’s genuine capabilities could not be accurately assessed.
The Road Ahead: Arancar’s Future and Jockey Speculation
Following the race, various speculations have surfaced regarding the future of Arancar and its jockey.
“For the horse’s sake, a rider change would be best, but Tsukue often keeps his mounts even after bad rides.”
“Please get off, including Croix.”
“Well, I think it will shine over longer distances.”
“Normally, if the pace is fast, you wouldn’t rush, but Kitamura really is no good.”
Notably, there are strong calls for a “rider change,” with speculation that this performance could influence future mounting opportunities. Furthermore, some users, believing in Arancar’s potential, express hope for its future performance, particularly over “longer distances,” indicating continued interest in its comeback.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1: What were the main points of criticism from users regarding Arancar’s race?
A1: The primary criticisms targeted Arancar’s extremely conservative “positioning,” where it dropped far back from the field at the start, and the subsequent “premature surge” (early move) from around the 3rd corner. Many users questioned the jockey’s judgment, suggesting it was akin to riding a legendary horse like Deep Impact.
Q2: What was the general sentiment towards jockey Yuichi Kitamura among users?
A2: Users expressed widespread and severe criticism, labeling him as “incompetent” and using the derogatory term “Tsukue” (机, a nickname for Yuichi Kitamura). Comparisons to past flawed rides and accusations of “insulting horse racing fans” led to an overall very low evaluation of his performance.
Q3: What were the opinions regarding Arancar’s intrinsic ability?
A3: Despite the strong criticism of the ride, several users assessed Arancar itself as “showing good footwork,” “the strongest in this field,” and “maintaining good speed for a long period.” However, there was also a prevalent view that the ride prevented the horse from showcasing its true potential, making it difficult to gauge its actual ability.
Q4: What are the user speculations concerning the future of Arancar and Yuichi Kitamura?
A4: Many users are vehemently calling for a “rider change” for Arancar. There’s also speculation that this ride could negatively impact Kitamura’s future riding opportunities, with comments like “Northern Farm must be furious, he might get sidelined.” For Arancar itself, some users hold hope, suggesting it will perform better over “longer distances.”
References
ヤナシ社長(旧：生成系競馬予想)
データ関連企業の社長であり、学生時代にはアルゴリズムコンテストで世界3位に入賞したAI技術者。20年以上にわたり統計解析を競馬予想に応用してきた競馬予測家でもあります。生成系AIを駆使した客観的で革新的な競馬予想を提供し、「生成AI競走馬評価」などのコンテンツを通じて、競馬をより深く楽しめるようサポートしています。
Next 有馬記念「ライラック」除外騒動の深層：ヘデントール仮登録とスティンガーグラス出走の是非 »
Previous « 有馬記念にライラック出られず？ ヘデントール登録に透ける思惑
Share
Published by
ヤナシ社長(旧：生成系競馬予想)
11か月 ago
-
Related Post
Recent Posts
【10/28 大井競馬】AI予想で読み解くマイルグランプリ！本命ベアバッキューンの信頼度と激走注意の穴馬たち 🐎✨
10月28日の大井競馬は、注目…
5時間 ago
【的中実績】2026/10/27 | 大井 12R 聖橋賞(C2)
大井 12R 聖橋賞(C2)の…
11時間 ago
2026年10月27日 大井 12R 聖橋賞(C2) 競馬予想｜本命◎アイビーブリザード・指数比較
2026年10月27日の大井 …
13時間 ago
2026年10月27日 門別 12R キンレンカ特別(B3) 競馬予想｜本命◎スキャボロフェアー・指数比較
2026年10月27日の門別 …
13時間 ago
2026年10月27日 大井 11R オパール賞競走(A2) 競馬予想｜本命◎コスモギガンティア・指数比較
2026年10月27日の大井 …
13時間 ago
2026年10月27日 門別 11R ツリバナ特別(B4) 競馬予想｜本命◎ニシノエンデヴァー・指数比較
2026年10月27日の門別 …
14時間 ago
All Rights ReservedView Non-AMP Version